Junak v. Cain
Junak v. Cain
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-30203 Summary Calendar
ANTHONY JUNAK,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
BURL CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary,
Respondent-Appellee.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 99-CV-1954-M -------------------- August 4, 2000 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Anthony Junak, Louisiana prisoner # 99298, seeks a
certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the dismissal of his
habeas corpus application as time-barred by the one-year statute
of limitations in
28 U.S.C. § 2244(d), as amended by the
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. The
district court determined that Junak’s state application for
postconviction relief, which was filed in 1995 and dismissed, on
July 2, 1998, as untimely pursuant to Louisiana Code of Criminal
Procedure article 930.8, was not “properly filed” as that term is
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-30203 2–
used in § 2244(d)(2), and thus, failed to toll the limitations
period.
Subsequent to the district court’s dismissal of Junak’s
§ 2254 application, this court held that a state postconviction
application, dismissed as untimely under article 930.8, was
nevertheless "properly filed" for purposes of the tolling
provision of § 2244(d)(2). Smith v. Ward,
209 F.3d 383, 385(5th
Cir. 2000). In light of Smith, Junak has established that
jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district
court was correct in its procedural ruling and whether Junak has
stated a facially valid constitutional claim. See Slack v.
McDaniel, ___ U.S. ___,
120 S. Ct. 1595, 1604(2000); Hall v.
Cain, ___ F.3d ___ (5th Cir. July 12, 2000),
2000 WL 815463.
A COA is GRANTED, the district court’s judgment of dismissal
is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the district court for
appropriate proceedings.
COA GRANTED; VACATED AND REMANDED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished