U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2000

Youngblood v. Prudential Ins Co

Youngblood v. Prudential Ins Co
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided September 14, 2000

Youngblood v. Prudential Ins Co

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 99-20556 con. w/ No. 99-20808

KATHERINE S. YOUNGBLOOD, Individually and on behalf of Youngblood & Associates PLLC, formerly known as Youngblood & White PLLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; MARY J. MILLER,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (H-98-CV-1794)

September 13, 2000 Before WOOD*, DAVIS and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:**

* Harlington Wood, Jr., Circuit Judge of the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation. ** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

After reviewing the record, considering the briefs of the parties and argument of counsel and, with the single exception described below, we are persuaded that the district court committed no error.

The parties agree that the record reflects that the costs incurred by appellees were $27,645.77 instead of $30,000. The judgment of the district court is MODIFIED to award appellee the sum of $27,645.77 in costs instead of $30,000 awarded by the district court. The judgment of the district court is in all other respects affirmed.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.