U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2000

Richard v. Pennzoil Expl Prodn

Richard v. Pennzoil Expl Prodn
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided September 28, 2000

Richard v. Pennzoil Expl Prodn

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ No. 00-30352 Summary Calendar _____________________

MURPHY G. RICHARD, Plaintiff, versus SOUTHWESTERN OFFSHORE CORP., Defendant-Cross-Defendant- Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant, ISLAND OPERATING CO., INC., Third Party Defendant- Cross Claimant-Appellee, COMMERCIAL UNION ASSURANCE CO., PLC; YORKSHIRE INSURANCE CO., LTD.; PHOENIX ASSURANCE PUBLIC LTD. CO.; SKANDIA MARINE INSURANCE CO., (U.K.), LTD.; TERRA NOVA INSURANCE CO., LTD.; THREADNEEDLE INSURANCE CO., LTD.; ASSURANCE GENERALES DE FRANCE INCENDIE ACCIDENTS REASSURANCES TRANSPORT, Third Party Defendants- Appellees. _______________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (USDC No. 98-CV-951) _______________________________________________________ September 25, 2000 Before REAVLEY, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* The appeal of Southwestern Offshore Corporation argues solely a maritime obligation of Island Operating Company under § 905(c) of the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 905(c), and its contract with Pennzoil Exploration & Production Company. We agree with the district court’s holding that the contract is a non-maritime contract and that the decision is controlled by Hodgen v. Forest Oil Corp., 87 F.3d 1512, 1526–29 (5th Cir. 1996).

AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.