IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-60346 Summary Calendar

BETTY BOYKIN,

Plaintiff-Appellant, versus

ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.; DON HINTZ; MIKE BAKARICH; JOSEPH HAGAN; MARY SEE,

Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 5-99-CV-60-BN -------------------- October 11, 2000

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant Betty Boykin appeals from an adverse summary

judgment dismissing her claims stemming from her allegations before

the district court that she was denied a promotion on the basis of

race, that she was paid disparate wages on the basis of race and

that she suffered racially discriminatory working conditions due to

her employer’s creation of “white and black jobs.”

Our de novo review of the summary judgment evidence and the

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. record before us convinces us that the district court correctly

dismissed the appellant’s claims. The district court carefully

considered appellant’s claims and its order dated March 2, 2000,

cogently and meticulously addressed her claims and provided a

correct analysis and conclusion as to each of her claims. We

affirm essentially for the reasons set forth by Judge Barbour in

his order of March 2, 2000.

AFFIRMED.