U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2000

Perales v. Conner

Perales v. Conner
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided September 29, 2000

Perales v. Conner

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-41440 Summary Calendar

RENE PERALES, Petitioner- Appellant, versus N.L. CONNER, Warden at Federal Correctional Institution, Texarkana, Respondent- Appellee.

--------------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 5:98-CV-372 --------------------------------------------------------- September 28, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges: PER CURIAM:* Rene Perales appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. He has failed to show that the district court erred in denying his petition. Perales has no due process right in his custodial classification. Wilson v. Budney, 976 F.2d 957, 958 (5th Cir. 1992). There is no indication that prison officials abused their discretion in classifying Perales. See McCord v. Maggio, 910 F.2d 1248, 1250 (5th Cir. 1990). Finally, he has failed to show that two or more classifications of similarly situated persons were treated differently and has thus failed to show an equal protection violation.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 99-41440 -2- See Stefanoff v. Hays County, 154 F.3d 523, 525-26 (5th Cir. 1998). Because Perales has failed to show that the district court erred in denying his petition, the judgment of that court is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.