Hope v. Connell
Hope v. Connell
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-10287 Summary Calendar
PATRICIA L. HOPE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus GEORGE T. CONNELL, JR.; GEORGE T. CONNELL, SR., Defendants-Appellees.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:98-CV-929-D -------------------- November 9, 2000 Before DAVIS, JONES and DEMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Patricia L. Hope has appealed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendants in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. We AFFIRM.
Hope contends that the district court abused its discretion by granting her retained counsel leave to withdraw from representing her further. Hope is not entitled to relief on this point because she did not validly object to the district court concerning the ruling, which is not plainly erroneous. See
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 00-10287 -2- Highlands Ins. Co. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, 27 F.3d 1027, 1031-32 (5th Cir. 1994).
Hope contends that the district court reversibly erred by refusing to appoint counsel to represent her and by granting summary judgment to the defendants. We reject these contentions substantially for the reasons stated in the district court’s memorandum opinion. See Hope v. Connell, No. 3:98-CV-929-D (N.D. Tex. Aug. 12, 1999)(unpublished).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.