Continental General v. Adams
Continental General v. Adams
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_______________________ No. 00-60070 _______________________
CONTINENTAL GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, MARY ANN ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant, versus WOOLF ESTATE, Estate of Mary Ann Woolf, Defendant-Appellee, ANDREA JUPE FRANKLIN, Intervenor Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi Civil Docket #4:98-CV-94-LN _________________________________________________________________ November 9, 2000 Before GOODWIN*, GARWOOD, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
* Circuit Judge of the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
After hearing oral argument in this case and studying the briefs and pertinent portions of the record, we are persuaded that the district court’s thorough and painstaking opinion contains neither clear factual error nor any error of law. The judgment is AFFIRMED essentially for the reasons stated by the district court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.