United States v. Hamilton

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. Hamilton

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________

No. 99-31253 Summary Calendar _____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALEX HAMILTON, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana (94-CR-89-ALL-A) _________________________________________________________________ October 30, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This appeal concerns revocation of supervised release.

Counsel for Alex Hamilton, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and

has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738

[

87 S. Ct. 1396

] (1967). Although notified of his right to file a

response, Hamilton has not done so.

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See

id.

Accordingly, counsel’s

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

Reference

Status
Unpublished