United States v. Hamilton
United States v. Hamilton
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ No. 99-31253 Summary Calendar _____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALEX HAMILTON, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana (94-CR-89-ALL-A) _________________________________________________________________ October 30, 2000 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* This appeal concerns revocation of supervised release.
Counsel for Alex Hamilton, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 [87 S. Ct. 1396] (1967). Although notified of his right to file a response, Hamilton has not done so. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See id. Accordingly, counsel’s
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.