N W Geomatics Canada v. England Jet Ctr Inc
N W Geomatics Canada v. England Jet Ctr Inc
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_______________________
No. 99-31390 _______________________
NORTH WEST GEOMATICS CANADA, INC,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
ENGLAND JET CENTER, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana Civil Docket #1:98-CV-842 _________________________________________________________________ November 8, 2000
Before GOODWIN*, GARWOOD, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The court has carefully considered this appeal in light
of the briefs, record excerpts, arguments and pertinent portions of
the record.
Having done so, we find no clear error in the district
court’s holding that appellant failed to prove lost profits in
accord with the test applicable in Louisiana. There was
* Circuit Judge of the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. insufficient evidence to support findings that the leased
aircraft’s lease would have been extended from April 9 through July
8; that another aircraft would have been sent to Venezuela to
perform the PITSA II contract; or that any other specific profit
opportunities were foregone after the loss of the leased aircraft.
We therefore do not reach the court’s findings concerning the
amount of lost profits. Additionally, the district court did not
abuse its discretion by refusing to allow appellant to amend its
complaint and assert a vicarious punitive damage claim, which is
both fact intensive and novel in Louisiana, only a few days before
trial.
For these reasons, the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished