Legion Insurance Co v. Steadfast Insurance
Legion Insurance Co v. Steadfast Insurance
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-50809
LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,
VERSUS
STEADFAST INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas (A-98-CV-285-SC) November 6, 2000 Before KING, Chief Judge, PARKER, Circuit Judge, and FURGESON*, District Judge.
ROBERT M. PARKER, Circuit Judge**:
Legion Insurance Company and Steadfast Insurance Company
appeal from a magistrate judge’s order denying declaratory relief
to both parties. Legion and Steadfast request a declaration of
* District Judge of the Western District of Texas, sitting by designation. ** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
1 insurance coverage concerning an accident at the business premises
of the insured, ICO, Inc.
ICO, Inc. hired Carlos Melendrez Ruiz through Worldwide
Temporary Services, Inc., a licensed provider of temporary workers
in Texas, on May 13, 1996. Ruiz died in an accident on May 16,
1996, his third day of work at ICO. The accident occurred when
Ruiz was unloading garbage from a metal plate mounted on a raised
forklift. Ruiz fell from the forklift, and the metal plate dropped
on top of him. The inexperienced forklift operator jumped off the
machine while it was still moving. The forklift ran over the metal
plate and crushed Ruiz’s head, killing him instantly.
The Ruiz family filed suit against ICO alleging negligence and
gross negligence. Under its commercial general liability insurance
policy with Steadfast, ICO was insured up to $1,000,000 with a
$50,000 deductible. The Steadfast policy did not cover regular
employees and leased workers, but included coverage for temporary
workers. Several days before scheduled mediation and only a month
before trial, Steadfast issued a reservation of rights letter.
Steadfast argued that Ruiz was a regular employee of ICO, not a
temporary worker as defined in its policy. Steadfast claimed that
because Ruiz was an employee of ICO, Legion should be liable for
damages under its workers compensation and employment liability
policy.3 In order to settle the case with the Ruiz family, Legion
3 Under its contract with ICO, Worldwide was obligated to provide worker’s compensation insurance. However, Worldwide’s insurance
2 contributed $500,000, Steadfast submitted $300,000 and Worldwide
allotted $50,000 for a total $850,000 settlement.
Legion filed this action against Steadfast seeking declaratory
relief. Legion claimed that Steadfast was solely liable for the
entire settlement amount. In the alternative, Legion argued that
both carriers were concurrently liable for the settlement amount
and that Steadfast was responsible for part of the $500,000
contributed by Legion. Steadfast filed a counterclaim alleging
that Legion owed the entire settlement amount. Following a three-
day bench trial, the magistrate judge, after considering the
testimony, the exhibits and the arguments of counsel, identified
the disputed facts and legal issues the resolution of which were
necessary to decide the rights of the parties. Then apparently
misperceiving a judge’s role in formal dispute resolution in the
federal courts, the magistrate judge made neither findings of fact
nor conclusions of law. Instead of deciding the case, the
magistrate judge simply proclaimed that the parties had made a wise
settlement. If the parties had merely been seeking praise for
their business acumen, it was hardly necessary to seek such through
the mechanism of a declaration of coverage. The fact that findings
and conclusions may be difficult is no excuse for failing to make
them.
We are left with no choice except to remand this matter for
carrier denied liability and filed for bankruptcy during the course of this litigation.
3 the magistrate judge to do what he should have done in the first
place- decide the case.
REMANDED
4
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished