Iwegbu v. Payne
Iwegbu v. Payne
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-10993 Conference Calendar
DANIEL IFY IWEGBU,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
RALPH J. PAYNE, Warden,
Respondent-Appellee.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:00-CV-271-C -------------------- December 13, 2000
Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Daniel Ify Iwegbu (#22600-077) has appealed the district
court's judgment dismissing with prejudice his application for a
writ of habeas corpus under
28 U.S.C. § 2241. Iwegbu contends
that he did not have a complete trial transcript on direct appeal
and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial.
The district court held that Iwegbu's claims cannot be brought in
a proceeding under
28 U.S.C. § 2241. Iwegbu contends that, under
the "savings clause" of
28 U.S.C. § 2255, he should be permitted
to pursue relief under
28 U.S.C. § 2241. Iwegbu has failed to
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-10993 -2-
carry his burden of showing that his remedies under
28 U.S.C. § 2255are inadequate or ineffective. See Kinder v. Purdy,
222 F.3d 209, 212-15(5th Cir. 2000); Pack v. Yusuff,
218 F.3d 448, 452-53(5th Cir. 2000). The judgment is AFFIRMED.
Iwegbu has moved for leave to supplement his brief with an
exhibit pertinent to his denial-of-trial-transcript claim.
Because it is not necessary to consider this claim to resolve the
appeal, the motion is DENIED.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished