Murphy v. Goffery
Murphy v. Goffery
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-40227 Conference Calendar
ROBERT D. MURPHY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
O. GOFFERY, Individually & In Her Official Capacity as An Officer; JACK B. PURSLEY, Individually & In His Official Capacity as An Officer,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:00-CV-8 - - - - - - - - - - December 13, 2000
Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Robert D. Murphy, Texas prisoner # 602729, appeals the
district court’s dismissal as frivolous of his
42 U.S.C. § 1983complaint. See
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Murphy argues that
the district court abused its discretion when it concluded that
his complaint ran afoul of the applicable statute of limitations.
Specifically, Murphy argues that he had filed a state complaint
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-40227 -2-
for the same injury within Texas’ two-year limitations period.
See
Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 16.003(a)(Vernon 1997).
The district court did not abuse its discretion when it
dismissed Murphy’s complaint, because he filed it in federal
court on January 3, 2000, for an injury that accrued on July 22,
1993. See Gartrell v. Gaylor,
981 F.2d 254, 256-57(5th Cir.
1993). Murphy’s state-court cause of action did not toll the
two-year limitations period. See Rogers v. Ricane Enter., Inc.,
930 S.W.2d 157, 167(Tex. App. 1996). Accordingly, the district
court judgment is AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished