IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-50258 Summary Calendar

LONNIE D. CLARK; ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

KARLA ROLEN CLARK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY; U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT; FORT WORTH MID-BRAZOS PROJECT; LOUIS A. BRUNETT, Reservoir Manager; UNKNOWN GOVERNMENT AGENTS,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-99-CV-20 - - - - - - - - - - November 27, 2000

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Karla Rolen Clark appeals from the district court’s grant of

summary judgment in favor of the defendants in her civil rights

complaint brought pursuant to

(3). She argues that

the above-named defendants-appellees conspired to deprive her of

her due process and equal protection rights by threatening to

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-50258 -2-

revoke her boathouse permit. She also argues that the Army Corp of

Engineers’ regulations governing boathouse permits violates the

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Finally, Clark asserts that

the district court erred by denying her motion to have an

independent arbitrator appointed to settle the dispute over the

permit.

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, and

we find no reversible error. Clark’s due process, equal

protection, and ADA claims are without merit. See Augustine v.

Doe,

(5th Cir. 1984); Forsyth v. Barr,

(5th Cir. 1994). Additionally, Clark has failed to show

that the district court erred by denying her request for the

appointment of an arbitrator. See United Steel Workers of Am. v.

Am. Mfg. Co.,

(1960). The district court’s

judgment is AFFIRMED.