Savoie v. Seacraft Shipyard
Savoie v. Seacraft Shipyard
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit
No. 00-30583 Summary Calendar
JODITH SAVOIE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
SEACRAFT SHIPYARD,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Louisiana (99-CV-1872) December 29, 2000 Before DAVIS, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jodith Savoie, a white female, was employed by Seacraft
Shipyard for approximately ten months ending April 3, 1998. Savoie
retained an attorney and on September 19, 1998, filed a charge of
discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
(“EEOC”) against Seacraft asserting that she was sexually harassed,
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. discriminated against, and discharged because of her gender. On
October 25, 1998, the EEOC issued its dismissal and notice of
rights which specifically provided that “If you decide to sue, you
must sue within 98 days from your receipt of this notice.” Savoie
did not file timely suit after receipt of the right to sue notice.
Instead, on January 19, 1999, Savoie filed a duplicate identical
charge of discrimination against Seacraft reiterating her assertion
that she was sexually harassed, discriminated against, and
discharged because of her gender. Savoie declined to participate
in an EEOC mediation of her claims and on July 30, 1999, the EEOC
issued a second dismissal and notice of right which was mailed to
Savoie. Savoie did not file her complaint against Seacraft until
October 12, 1999, almost one year after the EEOC’s issuance of its
first dismissal and notice of rights. Seacraft moved for summary
judgment which the district court granted. Savoie timely appeals.
We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the reply brief, the
record excerpts, and relevant portions of the record itself. For
the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum ruling
filed under date of April 5, 2000, we affirm the Final Judgment
entered in favor of Seacraft under date of April 25, 2000.
AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished