UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

___________________________

No. 00-30797 ___________________________

HARRY MENDOZA; ET AL,

Plaintiffs,

HARRY MENDOZA; NORVEL ORAZIO,

Plaintiffs-Appellees.

VERSUS

THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS; ET AL,

THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS,

Defendant-Appellant.

___________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana 98-CV-2868-J ___________________________________________________ January 5, 2001

Before JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI*, Judge.

PER CURIAM:**

Appellants challenge the district court’s interpretation of

the consent decree at issue in this case. For the reasons stated

by the district court in its order of May 31, 2000, we agree with

* Judge, U.S. Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. ** Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. the district court’s interpretation of the consent decree and

AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. Appellee’s motions0 to

supplement the record, to strike a portion of the brief, and to

strike the record are hereby DENIED.

AFFIRMED.

2