Holland v. United States
Holland v. United States
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-20444
ESME J. HOLLAND,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas H-98-CV-4137 - - - - - - - - - - March 8, 2001
Before KING, Chief Judge, ALDISERT* and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:**
Esme J. Holland appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor
of the United States. She brought a claim for a refund under the
Internal Revenue Code § 104(a)(2) which provides that income received
in payment for personal injuries is excluded from taxation. See
29 U.S.C. § 104(a)(2). The district court granted summary judgment
reasoning that Holland could not show that the payments stemmed from
emotional damages. This Court affirms on alternative grounds as
* Circuit Judge of the Third Circuit, sitting by designation. ** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. these grounds were properly asserted in district court.
It is clear under the plain language of the settlement agreement
that Holland reserved all claims for personal injuries. As such her
proceeds are not excludable under §104(a)(2) and instead constitute
taxable income.
We AFFIRM.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished