Freeman v. Hartman
Freeman v. Hartman
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-21033 Conference Calendar
CLYDE G. FREEMAN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
TRACEY HARTMAN; JON BEASLEY,
Defendants-Appellees.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CV-1199 -------------------- February 13, 2001
Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Clyde G. Freeman, Texas prisoner # 237263, appeals the
district court’s dismissal of his
42 U.S.C. § 1983lawsuit as
frivolous or for failure to state a claim, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). He conclusionally asserts that the district
court erred in dismissing those claims following a “five minute
‘Spears hearing’ where the issues were not addressed and where a
jury trial ha[d] been demanded in the complaint” and urges that
he was not given a chance to present any witnesses or documentary
evidence in support of his case, in violation of his due-process
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-21033 -2-
rights. However, Freeman does not specify what witnesses or
evidence he wished to proffer but was precluded from presenting,
and the record belies his claim that he was denied the
opportunity to present his case.
Even if his brief is liberally construed, Freeman does not
challenge the basis for the district court’s ruling, and he has
thus abandoned the sole ground for appeal. See Yohey v. Collins,
985 F.2d 222, 224-25(5th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, his appeal is
without merit and is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Both the
district court’s dismissal of Freeman’s complaint and this
court’s dismissal of the instant appeal count as “strikes” for
purposes of
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons,
103 F.3d 383, 385-87(5th Cir. 1996). Freeman is CAUTIONED that if
he accumulates a third “strike” under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), he
will not be able to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action
or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any
facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical
injury.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished