Mickel v. City of Pineville
Mickel v. City of Pineville
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-30639 Summary Calendar
ROBERT GENE MICKEL,
Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee,
versus
CITY OF PINEVILLE,
Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (USDC No. 99-CV-867) _______________________________________________________ March 1, 2001
Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Plaintiff-appellant Robert Gene Mickel appeals from summary judgment
against him on his claim for overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. (FLSA),
29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219(FLSA). We agree with the district court and
defendant-appellee City of Pineville that he is an exempt employee under the short
tests promulgated by the Secretary of Labor pursuant to
29 U.S.C. § 213(a). See
29 C.F.R. §§ 541.1(f), 541.2(e)(2); see also Lott v. Howard Wilson Chrysler-
Plymouth, Inc.,
203 F.3d 326, 331-33(5th Cir. 2000) (applying the short tests for
executive and administrative employees).
As Pineville’s Superintendent of Public Works, Mickel was responsible for
supervising the work of more than 100 employees, preparing and assigning work
orders, making recommendations as to hiring, firing, and purchasing decisions, and
completing annual evaluations of supervisors in his area. As a matter of law, his
position qualifies him as an executive and administrative employee who is exempt
from the overtime provisions of the FLSA.
Because we deny Mickel’s appeal, we do not reach Pineville’s alternative
cross-appeal regarding vacation hours.
AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished