United States v. De La Cruz De Jesus
United States v. De La Cruz De Jesus
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-50714 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RUFINA DE LA CRUZ DE JESUS, Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-00-CR-416-H - - - - - - - - - - February 15, 2001 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Rufina De La Cruz De Jesus appeals her sentence following her guilty plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. De La Cruz argues that her sentence should not have exceeded the two-year maximum sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). De La Cruz acknowledges that her argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but she seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 00-50714 - 2 - De La Cruz’s argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres, 523 U.S. at 235.
The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is granted.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.