Wilbon v. Critz
Wilbon v. Critz
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-10904 Conference Calendar
CHRISTOPHER WILBON,
Plaintiff-Appellant, versus
GERALD CRITZ, Police Officer with Lubbock Police Department, S. MORRIS, Police Officer with Lubbock Police Department, ANDREW DOBBS, Police Officer with Lubbock Police Department,
Defendants-Appellees.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:99-CV-144-BG -------------------- April 10, 2001
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Christopher Wilbon (#894065), a Texas state prisoner, has
appealed the magistrate judge's order dismissing his civil rights
complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon
which relief can be granted. See
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
Wilbon has failed to show that the magistrate judge erred or
abused her discretion in applying the rule in Heck v. Humphrey,
512 U.S. 477, 486-87(1994). See Berry v. Brady,
192 F.3d 504, 506(5th Cir. 1999) (standard of review).
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-10904 -2-
Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See
Howard v. King,
707 F.2d 215, 220(5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2. The dismissal of the instant appeal and the dismissal
as frivolous or for failure to state a claim by the magistrate
judge each count as a strike for purposes of
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
See Adepegba v. Hammons,
103 F.3d 383, 387-88(5th Cir. 1996).
We caution Wilbon that once he accumulates three strikes, he will
not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action
or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any
facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical
injury. See
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished