United States v. Mayo

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. Mayo

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 00-20124 Summary Calendar _____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SHELDON DENARD MAYO,

Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-338-ALL _________________________________________________________________ March 23, 2001

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jay T. Karahan, court-appointed counsel for Sheldon Denard

Mayo, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738

(1967). Mayo has

filed no response. Our independent review of the brief and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous appellate issue. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Reference

Status
Unpublished