Cousins v. Chandler
Cousins v. Chandler
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-41260 Conference Calendar
MARK ANTHONY COUSINS,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
ERNEST V. CHANDLER, Warden,
Respondent-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:00-CV-584 - - - - - - - - - - April 10, 2001
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Mark Anthony Cousins, federal prisoner # 43109-019, appeals
the district court’s dismissal of his
28 U.S.C. § 2241petition,
in which he attacked the validity of his conviction. Cousins’
motion to expedite the appeal is DENIED.
Cousins argues that the district court erred in dismissing
the petition without first compelling Respondent to answer and
that his claims were properly brought in a
28 U.S.C. § 2241petition because relief under
28 U.S.C. § 2255is inadequate and
ineffective. An answer is not required if it appears from the
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-41260 -2-
application that the applicant is not entitled to the writ.
28 U.S.C. § 2243. Cousins has failed to demonstrate that the
district court erred in concluding that relief under
28 U.S.C. § 2255was inadequate. See Tolliver v. Dobre,
211 F.3d 876, 877(5th Cir. 2000).
This appeal is without arguable merit, is frivolous, and is
therefore DISMISSED. See Howard v. King,
707 F.2d 215, 219-20(5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED. MOTION DENIED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished