Cousins v. Chandler

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Cousins v. Chandler

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-41260 Conference Calendar

MARK ANTHONY COUSINS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

ERNEST V. CHANDLER, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:00-CV-584 - - - - - - - - - - April 10, 2001

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mark Anthony Cousins, federal prisoner # 43109-019, appeals

the district court’s dismissal of his

28 U.S.C. § 2241

petition,

in which he attacked the validity of his conviction. Cousins’

motion to expedite the appeal is DENIED.

Cousins argues that the district court erred in dismissing

the petition without first compelling Respondent to answer and

that his claims were properly brought in a

28 U.S.C. § 2241

petition because relief under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

is inadequate and

ineffective. An answer is not required if it appears from the

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-41260 -2-

application that the applicant is not entitled to the writ.

28 U.S.C. § 2243

. Cousins has failed to demonstrate that the

district court erred in concluding that relief under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

was inadequate. See Tolliver v. Dobre,

211 F.3d 876, 877

(5th Cir. 2000).

This appeal is without arguable merit, is frivolous, and is

therefore DISMISSED. See Howard v. King,

707 F.2d 215, 219-20

(5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED. MOTION DENIED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished