Boyd v. USA/Rural Devel
Boyd v. USA/Rural Devel
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _______________________
No. 00-60841 Summary Calendar Civil Docket # 3:00-CV-94-B _______________________
In The Matter Of: U.S.A./RURAL DEVELOPMENT; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; JIMMY W. CROSS; F. WOODROW BROWN; WILLIAM SIMPSON,
Debtors. ______________________
HENRY BOYD, JR.,
Appellant,
versus
U.S.A./RURAL DEVELOPMENT; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; JIMMY W. CROSS; F. WOODROW BROWN; WILLIAM SIMPSON,
Appellees. _________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi _________________________________________________________________ April 4, 2001
Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellant Boyd has taxed the courts’ patience too long in
his attempts to circumvent the effects of foreclosure on his home
a dozen years ago and payments required to be made to FMHA under a
Chapter 13 bankruptcy plan. The instant appeal of yet another
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. dismissal of a frivolous claim is indecipherable. Boyd raises no
legal or factual issues that make sense. He has been warned before
about frivolous appeals. See Boyd v. Barkley,
166 F.3d 341(5th
Cir. 1998) (unpublished).
We now dismiss this appeal as frivolous and impose
sanctions. Boyd may not file any more appeals or related papers in
this court unless he obtains prior written consent of a judge of
this court.
Appeal DISMISSED; Sanctions Imposed.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished