Boyd v. USA/Rural Devel

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Boyd v. USA/Rural Devel

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _______________________

No. 00-60841 Summary Calendar Civil Docket # 3:00-CV-94-B _______________________

In The Matter Of: U.S.A./RURAL DEVELOPMENT; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; JIMMY W. CROSS; F. WOODROW BROWN; WILLIAM SIMPSON,

Debtors. ______________________

HENRY BOYD, JR.,

Appellant,

versus

U.S.A./RURAL DEVELOPMENT; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; JIMMY W. CROSS; F. WOODROW BROWN; WILLIAM SIMPSON,

Appellees. _________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi _________________________________________________________________ April 4, 2001

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant Boyd has taxed the courts’ patience too long in

his attempts to circumvent the effects of foreclosure on his home

a dozen years ago and payments required to be made to FMHA under a

Chapter 13 bankruptcy plan. The instant appeal of yet another

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. dismissal of a frivolous claim is indecipherable. Boyd raises no

legal or factual issues that make sense. He has been warned before

about frivolous appeals. See Boyd v. Barkley,

166 F.3d 341

(5th

Cir. 1998) (unpublished).

We now dismiss this appeal as frivolous and impose

sanctions. Boyd may not file any more appeals or related papers in

this court unless he obtains prior written consent of a judge of

this court.

Appeal DISMISSED; Sanctions Imposed.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished