United States v. Cuellar-Ramirez
United States v. Cuellar-Ramirez
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-40753 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FRUCTOSO CUELLAR-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-00-CR-197-1 - - - - - - - - - - April 12, 2001 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Fructoso Cuellar-Ramirez (Cuellar) appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for being an alien illegally in the United States following a prior deportation. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Cuellar argues that (1) the indictment was defective because it did not allege a general intent mens rea; (2) in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 120 S. Ct. 2438 (2000), his prior felony conviction was an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) and should have been alleged in the indictment; and (3) his prior conviction for possession of cocaine does not * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 00-40753 -2- constitute a “drug trafficking” crime; therefore, it is not an aggravated felony for purposes of sentencing.
All of Cuellar’s claims are foreclosed by controlling Fifth Circuit precedent. See United States v. Guzman-Ocampo, 236 F.3d 233, 237-39 (5th Cir. 2000)(upholding sufficiency of indictment for illegal reentry that contained substantially identical language as Cuellar’s indictment); United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000)(explaining that despite Apprendi prior aggravated felony is still a sentencing factor and not an element of the offense of illegal reentry), cert denied, 121 S. Ct. 1214
Accordingly, Cuellar’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.