United States v. Figueroa-Martinez
United States v. Figueroa-Martinez
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-41011 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JULIO FIGUEROA-MARTINEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-00-CR-216-1 -------------------- April 12, 2001
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Julio Figueroa-Martinez appeals the 77-month sentence
imposed following his plea of guilty to a charge of being found
in the United States after deportation, a violation of
8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the aggravated-felony conviction that
resulted in his increased sentence under
8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2)
was an element of the offense that should have been charged in
the indictment.
Figueroa-Martinez acknowledges that his argument is
foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-41011 -2-
v. United States,
523 U.S. 224(1998), but he seeks to preserve
the issue for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in
Apprendi v. New Jersey,
530 U.S. 466(2000).
Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,
120 S. Ct. at 2362; United States v. Dabeit,
231 F.3d 979, 984(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, (U.S. Feb. 26, 2001)(No. 00-8299).
Figueroa-Martinez’s argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the
district court is AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished