U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2001

United States v. Reagan

United States v. Reagan
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided June 27, 2001

United States v. Reagan

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-41407 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. RYAN CHRISTOPHER REAGAN Defendant - Appellant -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CR-9-ALL -------------------- June 26, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Ryan Christopher Reagan appeals his guilty plea conviction for bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Reagan argues that the district court improperly assigned a two-level sentence enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(2)(F) for using a threat of death during the course of the robbery and that the district court’s imposition of a $1,500 fine was error.

Section 2B3.1(b)(2)(F) of the Sentencing Guidelines provides that when a defendant uses a threat of death as part of a bank robbery, a two-level enhancement applies. The threat of death * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 00-41407 -2- may be an oral or written statement, an act, a gesture, or a combination thereof. U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1, comment. (n.6). In committing the robbery, Reagan passed a note to the bank teller stating that, if she did not hand over all the money in the drawer, “I do have a device that will hurt a great deal,” he had his right hand in his pocket, and the Government introduced testimony that the bank teller feared for her life. The district court did not err in applying U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(2)(F).

The district court’s imposition of a fine $6,000 less than that recommended in the PSR is not clearly erroneous and is specifically authorized by U.S.S.G. § 5E1.2(e). See United States v. O’Banion, 943 F.2d 1422, 1431-32 (5th Cir. 1991). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.