U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2001

United States v. Penuelas-Montoya

United States v. Penuelas-Montoya
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided June 15, 2001

United States v. Penuelas-Montoya

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-50748 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JESUS PENUELAS-MONTOYA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-00-CR-64-1 -------------------- June 15, 2001 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Jesus Penuelas-Montoya appeals from his conditional-guilty- plea conviction of illegal reentry after deportation, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment because his previous deportation proceedings violated the Due Process Clause. He also contends that his sentence should be vacated because the Government did not allege his prior felony conviction in the indictment.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 00-50748 -2- Penuelas concedes that the issues raised in this appeal are foreclosed by this court’s decision in United States v. Benitez- Villafuerte, 186 F.3d 651, 657-58 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1097 (2000), and the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), and that he raises the issues solely to preserve them for review by the Supreme Court. This court affirms the judgment of the district court.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.