United States v. Horton
United States v. Horton
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-20173 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARK ANTHONY HORTON, Defendant- Appellant.
---------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-439-ALL ---------------------------------- October 4, 2001 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Mark Anthony Horton appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. He argues that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional when the only interstate commerce nexus is the mere fact that the firearm at some point traveled interstate.
“This court has repeatedly emphasized that the constitutionality of § 922(g)(1) is not open to question.” See United States v. De Leon, 170 F.3d 494, 499 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 120 S. Ct. 156
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.