United States v. Herring
United States v. Herring
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-50204
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMAAL ISAAC HERRING, Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (USDC No. A-00-CR-105-ALL-SS) _______________________________________________________ September 12, 2001 Before REAVLEY, HIGGINBOTHAM and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* There has been understandable confusion in the past about whether “controlled substance offense” under Section 2K2.1(a)(2) of the guidelines included a conviction for mere possession of a controlled substance. The law is clear that a crime of violence or
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. controlled substance offense “does not include simple possession.” United States v. Gaitan, 954 F.2d 1005, 1011 (5th Cir. 1992). Sec. 4B1.2(2).
The PSR erred in the recommendation to this effect, and no objection was made by the defendant. The sentence was therefore the consequence of a mistake.
The sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.