U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2001

Straughn v. Kimmy

Straughn v. Kimmy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided September 17, 2001

Straughn v. Kimmy

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50513 Summary Calendar

RODNEY F. STRAUGHN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CHRISTOPHER J. KIMMY; MARIO A. JUAREZ; HENRY L. ESCOBER; HILDA VALADEZ; JEP YOUNG CANON, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-01-CV-177 -------------------------------- September 12, 2001 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges: PER CURIAM:* The motion filed by Rodney Straughn, Texas prisoner # 670935, for permission to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) is GRANTED. Although the district court erred by dismissing Straughn’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as barred by the applicable two-year statute of limitations, we AFFIRM the district court’s dismissal on alternate grounds. See United States v. McSween, 53 F.3d 684, 687 n.3 (5th Cir. 1995). The challenge Straughn raised in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint to the propriety of the arrest leading to his robbery conviction necessarily implicates the validity of that conviction.

As such, the challenge to his arrest is barred pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. (1994). See Mackey v. Dickson, 47 F.3d 744, 746 (5th Cir. 1994). The distri ct court’s decision dismissing Straughn’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.