United States v. Brown
United States v. Brown
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-21168 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
KEVIN REESE BROWN,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-396-1 -------------------- October 26, 2001
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Kevin Reese Brown appeals his guilty-plea conviction for
being a felon in possession of a firearm possessed in and
affecting interstate commerce, in violation of
18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). He contends that the factual basis
to which he pleaded was insufficient to support the interstate
commerce element of a § 922(g)(1) offense and that this court
should reconsider its jurisprudence regarding the
constitutionality of § 922(g)(1) in light of Jones v. United
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-21168 -2-
States,
529 U.S. 848(2000), and United States v. Morrison,
529 U.S. 598(2000).
“This court has repeatedly emphasized that the
constitutionality of § 922(g)(1) is not open to question.” See
United States v. De Leon,
170 F.3d 494, 499(5th Cir.), cert.
denied,
528 U.S. 863(1999). The cases cited by Brown are
distinguishable and do not affect this determination.
Consequently, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished