Ahmed v. Ashcroft

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Ahmed v. Ashcroft

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 00-60776 __________________

MOHAMMAD IMTIAZ AHMED,

Petitioner,

v.

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney General,

Respondent.

______________________________________________

Petition For Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals A72 511 281 ______________________________________________ October 10, 2001

Before DUHÉ and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI*, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:**

Petitioner Mohammad Ahmed petitions for review of an order of

the Board of Immigration Appeals (the “Board”) dismissing his

appeal from the immigration judge's denial of Ahmed's motion to

reopen his deportation proceedings. After careful consideration of

* Judge, U.S. Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. ** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. the briefs on file, the oral arguments presented upon submission,

and the record before us, we are convinced that, whether we examine

the Board's order of dismissal or the immigration judge's decision

denying his motion to reopen, no error or abuse of discretion with

respect to the denial of Ahmed's request to reopen has been shown.

In denying the petition for review, we note that (1)

petitioner clearly failed to file a timely motion to reopen; and

(2) failed to establish that equitable tolling, even were it

applicable to the limitations period, is appropriate in this case.

Finally, we find no merit to the suggestion that the Board erred in

not exercising its discretionary authority to sua sponte order the

proceeding reopened. Accordingly, the petition for review is

DENIED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished