United States v. Francis

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. Francis

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30355 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FREDDIE FRANCIS, JR,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 99-CR-20028-9 -------------------- October 9, 2001

Before DUHÉ, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Freddie Francis, Jr., appeals the district court’s denial of

his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) motion to reduce sentence based on

Amendment 591 to the Sentencing Guidelines. See U.S.S.G. App. C,

Amendment 591 (effective Nov. 1, 2000). Francis contends that

Amendment 591 should be applied in his case because his base

offense level was determined based on uncharged conduct that did

not represent his offense of conviction.

The provisions of Amendment 591 do not lower the guidelines

range applicable to Francis and do not apply to the determination

1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. of the base (or specific) offense levels within the applicable

offense guideline section or to any consideration of relevant

conduct. Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its

discretion in denying Francis’ motion. See United States v.

Gonzalez-Balderas,

105 F.3d 981, 982

(5th Cir. 1997); United States

v. Shaw,

30 F.3d 26, 28

(5th Cir. 1994). The judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished