McDowell v. Seachrist

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

McDowell v. Seachrist

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40016 Conference Calendar

JOHNNY ALLEN MCDOWELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MARK SEACHRIST, Director, Bradshaw State Jail; DIXON, Warden, Bradshaw State Jail,

Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:99-CV-406 -------------------- October 26, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Johnny Allen McDowell, Texas prisoner # 756787, appeals the

summary judgment dismissal of his civil rights complaint.

McDowell argues that his constitutional right to religious

freedom was violated when he was fed a meat product that

purported to be beef but which actually contained pork, which he

is forbidden to eat according to his religious beliefs as a

Muslim. After a de novo review of the record, we affirm. Based

on the summary judgment evidence, McDowell's claims, at best,

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-40016 -2-

amount to claims of negligence. Negligence is not actionable

under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

. See Daniels v. Williams,

474 U.S. 327, 333-35

(1986); Eason v. Thaler, 14

73 F.3d 1322

, 1327-28 n.2 (5th

Cir. 1996); George v. King,

837 F.2d 705, 707

(5th Cir. 1988).

Accordingly, the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished