United States v. Huitron
United States v. Huitron
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-40180 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUAN JAIME GONZALEZ HUITRON, also known as Jaime Espinoza Guiterrez,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:00-CR-91-ALL -------------------- October 29, 2001
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Juan Jaime Gonzalez Huitron appeals the 57-month sentence
imposed following his plea of guilty to a charge of being found
in the United States after deportation, a violation of
8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the felony conviction that resulted in
his increased sentence under
8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an element
of the offense that should have been charged in the indictment.
Huitron acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the
Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States,
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-40180 -2-
523 U.S. 224(1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for
Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New
Jersey,
530 U.S. 466(2000).
Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,
530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit,
231 F.3d 979, 984(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied,
121 S. Ct. 1214(2001). Huitron’s
argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished