Bloch v. Tombone

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Bloch v. Tombone

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40540 Conference Calendar

I. STEPHAN BLOCH,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

JOHN TOMBONE, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:01-CV-213 -------------------- October 26, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

I. Stephan Bloch, federal prisoner # 66982-079, appeals from

the district court’s denial of his

28 U.S.C. § 2241

petition,

challenging his conviction and sentence, based on the

determination that Bloch had not demonstrated that relief under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

was inadequate. Bloch argues that his due-

process rights were violated by the district court’s failure to

consider his claims on the merits and that his prior

28 U.S.C. § 2255

motion was improperly dismissed as time-barred.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-40540 -2-

Bloch does not make any argument that the reasons for the

district court’s denial of his

28 U.S.C. § 2241

petition were

error, nor does he otherwise argue that

28 U.S.C. § 2241

relief

was available to him because

28 U.S.C. § 2255

relief was

inadequate. By failing to brief any argument that the district

court’s reasons for denying his petition were error, Bloch has

waived the sole ground for appeal. See Yohey v. Collins,

985 F.2d 222, 224-25

(5th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, the appeal is

frivolous and is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished