Singleton v. New Orleans Plce
Singleton v. New Orleans Plce
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-30443 Conference Calendar
CRAIG A. SINGLETON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
NEW ORLEANS POLICE DEPARTMENT; HARRY CONNICK; WILLARD HILL, JR.; TYRONE VAIL; JOSEPH WILLIAMS; DONALD POKE,
Defendants-Appellees.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 01-CV-231-L -------------------- December 11, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Craig Singleton appeals the district court’s dismissal of
his
42 U.S.C. § 1983complaint for failure to state a claim upon
which relief could be granted. Singleton’s attempt to
incorporate by reference his district court habeas corpus
petition is insufficient to preserve error. See Perillo v.
Johnson,
79 F.3d 441, 443 n.1 (5th Cir. 1996). Singleton has not
filed an appellate brief containing legal argument explaining why
the district court’s decision was error. He has therefore waived
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-30443 -2-
that issue on appeal. See Yohey v. Collins,
985 F.2d 222, 225(5th Cir. 1993).
This appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous.
Howard v. King,
707 F.2d 215, 219-20(5th Cir. 1983). Because
the appeal is frivolous, it is dismissed. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished