Singleton v. New Orleans Plce

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Singleton v. New Orleans Plce

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30443 Conference Calendar

CRAIG A. SINGLETON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

NEW ORLEANS POLICE DEPARTMENT; HARRY CONNICK; WILLARD HILL, JR.; TYRONE VAIL; JOSEPH WILLIAMS; DONALD POKE,

Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 01-CV-231-L -------------------- December 11, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Craig Singleton appeals the district court’s dismissal of

his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

complaint for failure to state a claim upon

which relief could be granted. Singleton’s attempt to

incorporate by reference his district court habeas corpus

petition is insufficient to preserve error. See Perillo v.

Johnson,

79 F.3d 441

, 443 n.1 (5th Cir. 1996). Singleton has not

filed an appellate brief containing legal argument explaining why

the district court’s decision was error. He has therefore waived

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-30443 -2-

that issue on appeal. See Yohey v. Collins,

985 F.2d 222, 225

(5th Cir. 1993).

This appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous.

Howard v. King,

707 F.2d 215, 219-20

(5th Cir. 1983). Because

the appeal is frivolous, it is dismissed. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished