Obiozor v. Warden FCI Oakdale
Obiozor v. Warden FCI Oakdale
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-31133 Summary Calendar
GODFREY OKECHUKU OBIOZOR,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
WARDEN FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION OAKDALE; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondents-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 01-CV-1175 - - - - - - - - - - January 3, 2002 Before JOLLY, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
In this habeas corpus case filed pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2241, Godfrey Okechuku Obiozor, federal prisoner # 59498-079,
filed a notice of appeal from an order of the district court
construing his
28 U.S.C. § 2241petition as a
28 U.S.C. § 2255motion and transferring it to this court for consideration of
whether it meets the requirements for filing a successive
28 U.S.C. § 2255motion. Obiozor has indicated that he is not
seeking to raise a successive
28 U.S.C. § 2255motion, and he
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-31133 -2-
argues that the district court erred in construing his petition
as such.
This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its
own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby,
813 F.2d 659, 660(5th
Cir. 1987). We lack jurisdiction over the district court’s
interlocutory order. See Brinar v. Williamson,
245 F.3d 515, 518(5th Cir. 2001). Therefore, the appeal is DISMISSED. The case
is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the
Western District of Louisiana for consideration of Obiozor’s
28 U.S.C. § 2241petition.
APPEAL DISMISSED; CASE TRANSFERRED TO THE DISTRICT COURT.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished