U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2002

United States v. Lykogiorgos

United States v. Lykogiorgos
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 28, 2002

United States v. Lykogiorgos

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-11237 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NICOLAS LYKOGIORGOS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:01-CR-6-1 -------------------- February 27, 2002 Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Nicolas Lykogiorgos has moved for leave to withdraw, filing a motion and brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Lykogiorgos has filed a pro se response. The record has not been adequately developed for this court to consider Lykogiorgos’ ineffective assistance of counsel claims in this direct appeal.

See United States v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 314 (5th Cir. 1987).

Our independent review of the record, counsel’s Anders motion and brief, and Lykogiorgos’ pro se response discloses no * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 01-11237 -2- nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.