United States v. Beatty

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. Beatty

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20119 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JEROME LaBOOKER BEATTY,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-268-ALL -------------------- February 21, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jerome LaBooker Beatty appeals his jury-trial conviction for

being a felon in possession of a firearm possessed in and

affecting interstate commerce, in violation of

18 U.S.C. §§ 922

(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). Beatty argues that this court should

reconsider its jurisprudence regarding the constitutionality of

18 U.S.C. § 922

(g)(1) in light of Jones v. United States,

529 U.S. 848

(2000), and United States v. Morrison,

529 U.S. 598

(2000).

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-20119 -2-

“This court has repeatedly emphasized that the

constitutionality of § 922(g)(1) is not open to question.” See

United States v. Daugherty,

264 F.3d 513, 518

(5th Cir. 2001);

United States v. De Leon,

170 F.3d 494, 499

(5th Cir.); cert.

denied,

528 U.S. 863

(1999). Beatty concedes that his argument

is foreclosed by case law from this circuit. He raises his

argument solely to preserve it for Supreme Court review. The

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished