United States v. Reeves

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. Reeves

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20657 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAVID ALLAN REEVES,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-835-1 -------------------- February 6 2002 Before DUHÉ, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

David Allan Reeves appeals his guilty-plea conviction for bank

robbery and brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence.

Reeves argues that the district court erroneously informed him that

he faced a maximum three-year term of supervised release at his

guilty-plea hearing, but then sentenced Reeves to five years of

supervised release.

We have reviewed the record and the briefs submitted by the

parties and hold that the district court’s plea admonishment that

Reeves faced a maximum three-year supervised release term was

harmless error. See United States v. Bachynsky,

934 F.2d 1349, 1359-60

(5th Cir. 1991) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.

1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Reference

Status
Unpublished