Pichon v. Murphy Oil USA Inc

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Pichon v. Murphy Oil USA Inc

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 01-30731

BARBARA BAILEY PICHON

Plaintiff - Appellant

VERSUS

MURPHY OIL USA, INC.

Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans 00-CV-2355-C March 8, 2002

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM*

The district court dismissed this action filed under the

Family Medical Leave Act,

29 U.S.C. § 2611

et seq., on grounds that

the plaintiff failed to produce summary judgment evidence

establishing that her sinusitis prevented her from performing the

functions of her employment. After reviewing the summary judgment

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. record, we are satisfied that Pichon produced sufficient evidence

to defeat summary judgment on this issue.

Pichon’s summary judgment evidence included deposition

testimony by her physician, Dr. Hardges, along with absentee forms

signed by Dr. Hardges stating that Pichon was unable to work for

several days in September 1998 and March 1999 because of her

sinusitis. Dr. Hardges’s testimony was more equivocal than the

absentee forms, but the combination of the two was sufficient to

defeat summary judgment.

The district court did not rule on the Act’s second

requirement, that an employee’s incapacity be caused by a “serious

health condition,” and we do not reach this issue.

The judgment of the district court is therefore vacated and

the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this

opinion.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished