Pichon v. Murphy Oil USA Inc
Pichon v. Murphy Oil USA Inc
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit
No. 01-30731
BARBARA BAILEY PICHON Plaintiff - Appellant
VERSUS
MURPHY OIL USA, INC.
Defendant - Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans 00-CV-2355-C March 8, 2002
Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM* The district court dismissed this action filed under the Family Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2611 et seq., on grounds that the plaintiff failed to produce summary judgment evidence establishing that her sinusitis prevented her from performing the functions of her employment. After reviewing the summary judgment
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. record, we are satisfied that Pichon produced sufficient evidence to defeat summary judgment on this issue.
Pichon’s summary judgment evidence included deposition testimony by her physician, Dr. Hardges, along with absentee forms signed by Dr. Hardges stating that Pichon was unable to work for several days in September 1998 and March 1999 because of her sinusitis. Dr. Hardges’s testimony was more equivocal than the absentee forms, but the combination of the two was sufficient to defeat summary judgment.
The district court did not rule on the Act’s second requirement, that an employee’s incapacity be caused by a “serious health condition,” and we do not reach this issue.
The judgment of the district court is therefore vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.