Bowers v. Moore
Bowers v. Moore
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-60321 Summary Calendar
SAM BOWERS; KATIE RENE PERRONE; MICHELLE O’HARA; JEFF REXROAD; SHAWN RICHARD O’HARA,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus
MIKE MOORE; STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, c/o Mike Moore,
Defendants-Appellees.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 2:00-CV-54-PG -------------------- February 6, 2002 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Sam Bowers, Michelle O’Hara, Jeff Rexroad, and Shawn Richard
O’Hara (“Appellants”) appeal the district court’s dismissal
without prejudice of their
42 U.S.C. § 1983complaint. The
complaint was dismissed because 1) it was a mixed petition; 2)
service of process was untimely; and 3) service of process by
certified mail was insufficient.
Appellants challenge only the finding that service of
process by certified mail was insufficient. However, Appellants
have failed to brief the relevant issue, as they has provided
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-60321 -2-
neither argument nor authorities to show that the district court
erred in dismissing their suit. See Yohey v. Collins,
985 F.2d 222, 225(5th Cir. 1993); Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(9). Accordingly,
this appeal is dismissed as frivolous. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Appellants have also filed a reply brief in which they moved this
court to strike the brief filed by the Appellees. That motion to
strike is DENIED.
APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. MOTION TO
STRIKE APPELLEES’ BRIEF DENIED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished