U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2002

Holloway v. Cockrell

Holloway v. Cockrell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided May 15, 2002

Holloway v. Cockrell

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20785 Summary Calendar

LINDSEY EVERETT HOLLOWAY, Petitioner-Appellant, versus JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CV-1659 - - - - - - - - - - May 14, 2002 Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Lindsey Everett Holloway, Texas prisoner #287889, was granted a certificate of appealability (COA) by this court on the issue whether his claim that he is entitled to release to mandatory supervision based upon his having served a total of approximately 62 years, including good time, on his 99-year sentence, was improperly dismissed as successive. 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Holloway has shown that the district court erred in * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 01-20785 -2- dismissing his failure-to-release claim as successive, and respondent concedes that the claim is not successive. See In re Cain, 137 F.3d 234, 236-37 (5th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, the district court’s dismissal of Holloway’s failure-to-release claim as successive is VACATED, and this case is REMANDED for consideration of the merits of that claim.

Holloway’s motions (1) for leave to file an out-of-time motion to reconsider the denial of COA, and (2) to supplement his out-of-time motion to reconsider the denial of COA are DENIED.

VACATED AND REMANDED; PETITIONER’S MOTIONS DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.