Crawford v. Christian
Crawford v. Christian
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-41191 Summary Calendar
MARK CRAWFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus BRUCE CHRISTIAN, Individually and Official Capacities; SHARYLAND INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas B-00-CV-151 May 30, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Mark Crawford appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against Sharyland Independent School District and Bruce Christian for excessive corporal punishment. Crawford argues that excessive corporal punishment is a violation of substantive due process, and should be actionable under § 1983. He acknowledges that under our existing precedent his claims are without merit, but * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. he seeks to preserve the issue for further review.
We have consistently held that a public school student cannot state a § 1983 claim for denial of substantive due process based on excessive corporal punishment.1 The magistrate judge properly dismissed Crawford’s § 1983 claims.
It is also well-established that Texas provides adequate state remedies for excessive corporal punishment.2 Thus Crawford’s argument that he should be allowed to proceed against the School District because Texas provides no remedy is foreclosed.
AFFIRMED.
Moore v. Willis Indep. Sch. Dist., 233 F.3d 871, 874 (5th Cir. 2000). Id. at 876.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.