U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2002

United States v. Sinquefield

United States v. Sinquefield
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided June 20, 2002

United States v. Sinquefield

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-11077 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL RAY SINQUEFIELD, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CR-213-1-E -------------------- June 18, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Michael Ray Sinquefield appeals his conviction following his guilty plea to possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute. He argues that the district court erred when it ruled that he lacked standing to bring his motion to suppress evidence. Sinquefield fails to demonstrate that he had an individual subjective and legitimate expectation of privacy in the mobile home. Minnesota v. Carter, 525 U.S. 83, 90 (1998); United States v. Vega, 221 F.3d 789, 795 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1155 (2001).

AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.