U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2002

United States v. Espinoza-Vasquez

United States v. Espinoza-Vasquez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided June 20, 2002

United States v. Espinoza-Vasquez

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-41263 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MACRINO ESPINOZA-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-00-CR-313-2 -------------------- June 19, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Macrino Espinoza-Vasquez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute.

Espinoza contends that 21 U.S.C. § 841 is unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). As Espinoza concedes, his argument is foreclosed by circuit precedent, but he raises the issue to preserve it for Supreme Court review. See United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1045 (2001). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.