United States v. Ramirez
United States v. Ramirez
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-10784
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JORGE A RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant. ___________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (3:01-CR-44-1-R) __________________________________________________________________ September 17, 2002 Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* We hold: (1) the evidence was sufficient to allow a reasonable juror to find Ramirez’ statement that he would make the home he purchased through HUD his primary home for three years was false when made; (2) the district court did not commit reversible plain error by allowing the Government’s examination of Agent Gilbert, who was called as an adverse witness by Ramirez; and (3) the district court did not commit clear error in assessing a two level enhancement for “more than minimal planning”. Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.